How The West Was Lost It took nearly four years for all the western streets Shaker Heights left behind to be annexed to Cleveland |
Most voters who signed the June 1911 petition that took Shaker Village out of Cleveland Heights owned small homes on its western streets. We believe they saw it a way to have their streets in Cleveland so their children could attend the best schools. |
In July 1911 voters in area GG began to work on being annexed to Cleveland. Voters in area MM thought differently. We will suggest possible motivations later on this page. It was not until February 1915 that they became part of Cleveland. |
|||
|
||||
GG and MM in the map
above were the western part of Shaker Village not included when
in October 1911 it voted to become Shaker Heights
Village. Annexation happened in two steps. |
Area GG's annexation began in August 1911 and was completed March 2, 1912. Area MM's annexation began in June 1913 and was completed March 2, 1915. |
HOMES IN AREA GG The owners of these homes signed the 1911 petition |
||
|
|
|
|
AREA GG ASKS FOR ANNEXATION TO
CLEVELAND AND SUCCEEDS Started August, 1911 Approved by Cleveland, then the county March 2, 1912 |
|
In August 1911, two months before Shaker Village voted to leave its western part behind as it created Shaker Heights Village, voters in the streets closest to Cleveland signed a petition to annex to the city. It moved ahead as shown below: Cleveland |
No copy of area GG's 1911 petition to Cleveland is available. Why
did the County Commissioners need five months to approve this annexation to
Cleveland? |
AREA MM ASKS COUNTY FOR DETACHMENT
AND FAILS Started September 11, 1912 No results |
||||||||||||||||||||
After March 2, 1912, with area GG in Cleveland, area MM was
contiguous to the city and could ask to be annexed. It did not. When
County Archivist Dr. Judy Cetina showed me a petition from MM
voters, I saw their determination not to be in Cleveland. Dated September 11, 1912 and signed by 21 voters, a few with addresses east of East 127th, it was a request to be detached from Shaker Village and to become Woodland Township. |
As the commissioners wrote in their resolutions that established them, townships should not be too small. Villages with thousands of residents such as Glenville and Newburgh City, south of MM, were joining Cleveland, with its more than a half-million residents. The commissioners were not going to create a new small village next to the city. They did not act on area MM's petition, part of which is shown below. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Why did voters in area MM ask for detachment? | ||||||||||||||||||||
MM's voters did not want to be part of Cleveland, or to say it
differently, they wanted to live in a suburb. Yet voters in area GG,
west of East Blvd. had asked to be annexed to Cleveland soon after they
became residents of Shaker Village. What would account for the
very different views of the MM voters, who lived east of East Blvd.
and along Fairmount Road? Our pages have copies of the 1910 census forms for the village. Because the census enumerator walked the streets visiting each residence, the forms were in nearly perfect west-to-east order. Forms 1, 2 and 4 were for area GG, 5 and 6 were for area MM. For all male heads of household we made this tally: Was he born in the United States or some other English-speaking country? The results, shown in the table below, reveal a striking difference between those living on opposite sides of East Blvd - between GG and MM voters. That wide boulevard was a cultural divide.
|
The homeowners in area MM were in the "heights". They could look down the
hill at a crowded city covered with a carbon haze, with its large and
fast-growing
immigrant population and so many school children from homes where
a language other than English was spoken. MM voters may have seen
themselves as settled, successful and suburban, wanting their sons and
daughters to go to a school with children from homes like
theirs.
As for schools, there was good news. In place of three rooms in the Van Sweringen
office at Lee Road and
Shaker. Shaker Heights would soon
have a new, larger
school, nearly a half mile closer.
|
AREA MM ASKS CLEVELAND FOR ANNEXATION AND
SUCCEEDS Started September 11, 1912 City approved September 8, 1913 County approved March 2, 1915 |
|
In June 1913 voters in area MM knew their plea to the county had failed. Their western neighbors in GG were now in the city, as were their neighbors on the south side of Woodland Avenue, for Newburg City had also become part of Cleveland. |
They did what they did not want to do two years earlier. Their annexation petition had 30 signers, all living in area MM. (The 1912 request to be a separate township had fewer than 20 signers who lived in the area.) Here is part of the petition. |
|
|
Here is a summary
of the annexation's progress. Cleveland |
A visit to the Cuyahoga County Archives in its new home on Perkins at East 40th and the help of County Archivist Dr. Judy Cetina found documents dealing with issues such as bond indebtedness and assessments had to be computed and payments made or promised. That seems to be only a partial explanation of an unduly long process. |
|
||||||||
LEARN MORE: COPIES OF THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS OTHER PAGES ON THIS WEBSITE
As of 6/27/2018 |